UFOs and Nukes

The International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN) promotes the United Nations’ Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons! So does The Jesse A. Marcel Library!

The Jesse A. Marcel Library supports ICAN – International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons! Find them here: https://www.icanw.org/

The Jesse A. Marcel Library supports the work of Future of Life Institute (https://futureoflife.org/)

True statements: UFOs, or rather the intelligence behind them, have disabled both US and Russian nuclear weapons on multiple occasions going all the way back to the mid-1960s! On at least four occasions they have briefly activated ICBMs in their launching silos before then shutting them down.

Houston, We Have a BIG Problem!

How these technological feats are accomplished by The Others (those “behind the wheel “of UFOs) has never been explained or even completely understood. The UFO/Nukes connection may be the most important reason why we must give the UFO phenomenon our focused attention. Those beings behind the UFOs, we can surmise, are highly intelligent and display an understanding of physics that we have, as of yet, been unable to comprehend, much less replicate. We see the evidence of that in the performance characteristics of their machinery (UFOs/USOs).

It is entirely appropriate that we question why these missions have been carried out and whether such actions have been intended to convey a message. It seems the most obvious message would be, “We can do this, you cannot stop us from doing it, and therefore your nuclear weapons are useless against us.” Could there be more to the intended message? Before we address that question, let’s review what is known about these incidents. That information primarily comes from 4 individuals – Capt. Robert Salas, Capt. David Schindele, Capt. Robert Jacobs, and UFO researcher Robert Hastings, author of UFOs and Nukes – Extraordinary Encounters at Nuclear Weapons Sites.

To educate yourself about the details of these incidents, here I will send you to explore the best source of this information, the website of Mr. Robert Hastings. The JAML regards Robert Hastings as a true, but as yet uncelebrated, American hero.

Mr. Hastings’ website.

Now That You Know About UFOs and Nuclear Weapons

If an average-yield 100 kT (kiloton) nuclear weapon is dropped on New York City, we can expect to see 409,610 citizens die immediately and 635,940 citizens will be seriously injured. There will be no emergency medical care available and therefore many of the injured will soon also die. You can, if you dare, obtain such fatality/injury data for your own city at this website: https://nuclearsecrecy.com/nukemap/

THIS PAPER provides an excellent analysis of what will likely happen if a limited nuclear exchange between India and Pakistan (each side launching a modest 50 X 15kT nuclear missiles) occurs. Spoiler: global temperatures will fall precipitously. This will result in a “nuclear famine” lasting at least 10 years resulting in millions who will die from starvation worldwide. Despite being on the other side of the planet from the war, the US will not be spared.

Worldviews – How do you see the nuclear weapons conundrum?

As we consider our own worldviews in the context of UFOs vs. nuclear weapons, we will each have our own opinions about the answers to these important questions:

  1. How many nuclear weapons are presently on Earth? (Answer: about 17,000).
  2. How many nuclear weapons should we have on Earth, if any?
  3. Is a nuclear war most likely to come as a result of a deliberate launch or some other unforeseen circumstance (human error, terrorism, misidentification, computer glitch, entropy/degradation of control systems over time)?
  4. Is our risk of a nuclear war occurring anywhere on Earth increasing, decreasing, or remaining the same with each passing year?
  5. Are nuclear weapons immoral?
  6. Given that nuclear weapons target entire cities of private citizens, are they unethical?
  7. Is risking everything over geopolitical/economic squabbles reasonable, or even sane?
  8. Should American citizens, indeed all world citizens, have been informed about these UFO vs. nukes events soon after they happened 45+ years ago?
  9. Does the withholding of this information concerning UFOs vs. nukes from all world citizens for 45+ years and through the present day constitute criminality on the parts of those “in the know” about the true nature of these events?
  10. Had you known about these events when they happened, would that knowledge have affected your acceptance of nuclear weapons over the past 45+ years?
  11. Have The Others’ UFOs vs. nukes actions in disabling our nuclear weapons been acts of hostility?
  12. Have The Others’ UFOs vs. nukes actions been acts of benevolence, or at least good advice?
  13. Why weren’t any of the disabled nuclear weapons permanently destroyed by The Others?
  14. If The Others are human time travelers from our future (they may be), should they have a say in whether or not we have nuclear weapons?
  15. Why hasn’t Japan signed the UN’s Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons?
  16. Do the few human beings involved in launching nuclear weapons have the right to make that decision to launch for all of us?
  17. Do the few human beings involved in launching nuclear weapons have the right to make that decision to launch for all other living, non-human species (plant, insect, and animal) that coexist with us on this planet?
  18. Would you want you or your family members to survive a nuclear war?
  19. What was the chief request of Japanese citizens who survived but were severely burned during the nuclear blasts inflicted on Hiroshima and Nagasaki? (Answer: water, but none was available. Rivers flowing through Hiroshima were contaminated with radiation.)
  20. Are human beings the de-facto stewards of this planet?
  21. If human beings are the de-facto stewards of life on planet Earth, then what are our responsibilities in that regard?
  22. If human beings are not the de-facto stewards of life of planet Earth, then who is?
  23. If The Others are (or regard themselves as) the de-facto stewards of life on planet Earth, should we be concerned, even worried, about their interventions with our nuclear weapons and what those actions might mean?
  24. The International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN) advocates for global nuclear disarmament through the United Nations’ Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW). Should we, as US citizens, be demanding that our country sign the TPNW?

Poll: Should President Biden call for a global ban of nuclear weapons?